English with Ross

English with Ross is for English learners. Build real-life confidence in speaking, writing and listening.

Why you should join: Vocabulary, grammar, conversation practice and cultural insights for free, with premium paths in Business, Conversational and Academic English and personalised support when you want more. Free to join.

The one-liner

A free Skool English club for practical, everyday progress, with premium learning paths for work and study.

What they actually sell

English with Ross, run by Ross Gilman, lives on Skool. Its public pitch: "Learn real-life English with confidence." It is free to join. Ross Gilman runs it as a practical, enjoyable place to improve English. Free content covers vocabulary, grammar, conversation and cultural insights, and members are asked to comment, practise and ask questions rather than just read. Premium learning paths are named for Business English, Conversational English and Academic English, with extra resources and personalised support. The description adds that the community gives back. Inside sit 9 courses and a dense module library.

Who pays and why

Adult learners who want to communicate more confidently at work, speak naturally or prepare for an exam. The struggle is consistency, because practice fades without a place to use the language. They join for vocabulary, grammar and conversation practice plus premium paths in Business, Conversational and Academic English.

Where the members come from

Ross Gilman's YouTube and Instagram presence appears to feed the room. The Skool community reads as the member back end for people already drawn to that work. Exact follower counts stay off the public page.

What's holding it back

The premium paths are named but the join path shows only a free door, so learners cannot see how to reach them or what they cost.

Steal this

Split the paid offer by goal, such as work, travel or exams, so each learner picks the path that matches their reason.

Would this work in another niche?

Yes for any skill with distinct use cases, such as writing for work versus fiction. Weak for one-goal topics.